Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations.
Identifieur interne : 004218 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004217; suivant : 004219Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations.
Auteurs : Ulo Niinemets [Estonie] ; Najwa Al Afas ; Alessandro Cescatti ; An Pellis ; Reinhart CeulemansSource :
- Tree physiology [ 0829-318X ] ; 2004.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- physiologie : Arbres, Feuilles de plante, Populus, Tiges de plante.
- Biomasse, Lumière.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Plant Leaves, Plant Stems, Populus, Trees.
- Biomass, Light.
Abstract
Leaf architecture, stand leaf area index and canopy light interception were studied in 13 poplar clones growing in a second rotation of a coppice plantation, to determine the role of leaf architectural attributes on canopy light-harvesting efficiency and to assess biomass investment in leaf support tissue. Stand leaf area index (L) varied from 2.89 to 6.99, but L was only weakly associated with canopy transmittance (TC). The weak relationship between TC and L was a result of a higher degree of foliage aggregation at larger values of L, leading to lower light-interception efficiency in stands with greater total leaf area. We observed a strong increase in leaf aggregation and a decrease in light-harvesting efficiency with decreasing mean leaf petiole length (PL) but not with leaf size, possibly because, in cordate or deltoid poplar leaves, most of the leaf area is located close to the petiole attachment to the lamina. Although PL was the key leaf characteristic of light-harvesting efficiency, clones with longer petioles had larger biomass investments in petioles, and there was a negative relationship between PL and L, demonstrating that enhanced light harvesting may lead to an overall decline in photosynthesizing leaf surface. Upper-canopy leaves were generally larger and had greater dry mass (MA) and nitrogen per unit area (NA) than lower-canopy leaves. Canopy plasticity in MA and NA was higher in clones with higher foliar biomass investment in midrib, and lower in clones with relatively longer petioles. These relationships suggest that there is a trade-off between photosynthetic plasticity and biomass investment in support, and also that high light-harvesting efficiency may be associated with lower photosynthetic plasticity. Our results demonstrate important clonal differences in leaf aggregation that are linked to leaf structure and biomass allocation patterns within the leaf.
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.2.141
PubMed: 14676031
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations.</title><author><name sortKey="Niinemets, Ulo" sort="Niinemets, Ulo" uniqKey="Niinemets U" first="Ulo" last="Niinemets">Ulo Niinemets</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, EE 51010 Tartu, Estonia. ylo@zbi.ee</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Estonie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, EE 51010 Tartu</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>EE 51010 Tartu</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Al Afas, Najwa" sort="Al Afas, Najwa" uniqKey="Al Afas N" first="Najwa" last="Al Afas">Najwa Al Afas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cescatti, Alessandro" sort="Cescatti, Alessandro" uniqKey="Cescatti A" first="Alessandro" last="Cescatti">Alessandro Cescatti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellis, An" sort="Pellis, An" uniqKey="Pellis A" first="An" last="Pellis">An Pellis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ceulemans, Reinhart" sort="Ceulemans, Reinhart" uniqKey="Ceulemans R" first="Reinhart" last="Ceulemans">Reinhart Ceulemans</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:14676031</idno><idno type="pmid">14676031</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/treephys/24.2.141</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">004369</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004369</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004369</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">004369</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004369</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations.</title><author><name sortKey="Niinemets, Ulo" sort="Niinemets, Ulo" uniqKey="Niinemets U" first="Ulo" last="Niinemets">Ulo Niinemets</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, EE 51010 Tartu, Estonia. ylo@zbi.ee</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Estonie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, EE 51010 Tartu</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>EE 51010 Tartu</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Al Afas, Najwa" sort="Al Afas, Najwa" uniqKey="Al Afas N" first="Najwa" last="Al Afas">Najwa Al Afas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cescatti, Alessandro" sort="Cescatti, Alessandro" uniqKey="Cescatti A" first="Alessandro" last="Cescatti">Alessandro Cescatti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellis, An" sort="Pellis, An" uniqKey="Pellis A" first="An" last="Pellis">An Pellis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ceulemans, Reinhart" sort="Ceulemans, Reinhart" uniqKey="Ceulemans R" first="Reinhart" last="Ceulemans">Reinhart Ceulemans</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Tree physiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0829-318X</idno><imprint><date when="2004" type="published">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomass (MeSH)</term><term>Light (MeSH)</term><term>Plant Leaves (physiology)</term><term>Plant Stems (physiology)</term><term>Populus (physiology)</term><term>Trees (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres (physiologie)</term><term>Biomasse (MeSH)</term><term>Feuilles de plante (physiologie)</term><term>Lumière (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (physiologie)</term><term>Tiges de plante (physiologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arbres</term><term>Feuilles de plante</term><term>Populus</term><term>Tiges de plante</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Plant Leaves</term><term>Plant Stems</term><term>Populus</term><term>Trees</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomass</term><term>Light</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Biomasse</term><term>Lumière</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Leaf architecture, stand leaf area index and canopy light interception were studied in 13 poplar clones growing in a second rotation of a coppice plantation, to determine the role of leaf architectural attributes on canopy light-harvesting efficiency and to assess biomass investment in leaf support tissue. Stand leaf area index (L) varied from 2.89 to 6.99, but L was only weakly associated with canopy transmittance (TC). The weak relationship between TC and L was a result of a higher degree of foliage aggregation at larger values of L, leading to lower light-interception efficiency in stands with greater total leaf area. We observed a strong increase in leaf aggregation and a decrease in light-harvesting efficiency with decreasing mean leaf petiole length (PL) but not with leaf size, possibly because, in cordate or deltoid poplar leaves, most of the leaf area is located close to the petiole attachment to the lamina. Although PL was the key leaf characteristic of light-harvesting efficiency, clones with longer petioles had larger biomass investments in petioles, and there was a negative relationship between PL and L, demonstrating that enhanced light harvesting may lead to an overall decline in photosynthesizing leaf surface. Upper-canopy leaves were generally larger and had greater dry mass (MA) and nitrogen per unit area (NA) than lower-canopy leaves. Canopy plasticity in MA and NA was higher in clones with higher foliar biomass investment in midrib, and lower in clones with relatively longer petioles. These relationships suggest that there is a trade-off between photosynthetic plasticity and biomass investment in support, and also that high light-harvesting efficiency may be associated with lower photosynthetic plasticity. Our results demonstrate important clonal differences in leaf aggregation that are linked to leaf structure and biomass allocation patterns within the leaf.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">14676031</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0829-318X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>24</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Tree physiology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Tree Physiol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>141-54</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Leaf architecture, stand leaf area index and canopy light interception were studied in 13 poplar clones growing in a second rotation of a coppice plantation, to determine the role of leaf architectural attributes on canopy light-harvesting efficiency and to assess biomass investment in leaf support tissue. Stand leaf area index (L) varied from 2.89 to 6.99, but L was only weakly associated with canopy transmittance (TC). The weak relationship between TC and L was a result of a higher degree of foliage aggregation at larger values of L, leading to lower light-interception efficiency in stands with greater total leaf area. We observed a strong increase in leaf aggregation and a decrease in light-harvesting efficiency with decreasing mean leaf petiole length (PL) but not with leaf size, possibly because, in cordate or deltoid poplar leaves, most of the leaf area is located close to the petiole attachment to the lamina. Although PL was the key leaf characteristic of light-harvesting efficiency, clones with longer petioles had larger biomass investments in petioles, and there was a negative relationship between PL and L, demonstrating that enhanced light harvesting may lead to an overall decline in photosynthesizing leaf surface. Upper-canopy leaves were generally larger and had greater dry mass (MA) and nitrogen per unit area (NA) than lower-canopy leaves. Canopy plasticity in MA and NA was higher in clones with higher foliar biomass investment in midrib, and lower in clones with relatively longer petioles. These relationships suggest that there is a trade-off between photosynthetic plasticity and biomass investment in support, and also that high light-harvesting efficiency may be associated with lower photosynthetic plasticity. Our results demonstrate important clonal differences in leaf aggregation that are linked to leaf structure and biomass allocation patterns within the leaf.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Niinemets</LastName><ForeName>Ulo</ForeName><Initials>U</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, EE 51010 Tartu, Estonia. ylo@zbi.ee</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Al Afas</LastName><ForeName>Najwa</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cescatti</LastName><ForeName>Alessandro</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pellis</LastName><ForeName>An</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ceulemans</LastName><ForeName>Reinhart</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Canada</Country><MedlineTA>Tree Physiol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100955338</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0829-318X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018533" MajorTopicYN="N">Biomass</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008027" MajorTopicYN="N">Light</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018515" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Leaves</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018547" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Stems</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014197" MajorTopicYN="N">Trees</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2003</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2003</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14676031</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1093/treephys/24.2.141</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Estonie</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Al Afas, Najwa" sort="Al Afas, Najwa" uniqKey="Al Afas N" first="Najwa" last="Al Afas">Najwa Al Afas</name><name sortKey="Cescatti, Alessandro" sort="Cescatti, Alessandro" uniqKey="Cescatti A" first="Alessandro" last="Cescatti">Alessandro Cescatti</name><name sortKey="Ceulemans, Reinhart" sort="Ceulemans, Reinhart" uniqKey="Ceulemans R" first="Reinhart" last="Ceulemans">Reinhart Ceulemans</name><name sortKey="Pellis, An" sort="Pellis, An" uniqKey="Pellis A" first="An" last="Pellis">An Pellis</name></noCountry><country name="Estonie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Niinemets, Ulo" sort="Niinemets, Ulo" uniqKey="Niinemets U" first="Ulo" last="Niinemets">Ulo Niinemets</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004218 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004218 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:14676031
|texte= Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:14676031" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |